Sensex

Monday, August 30, 2010

Fw: Company Report: Ashok Leyland: “Smooth ride ahead” – BUY

 

 

Ashok Leyland: "Smooth ride ahead" – BUY

CMP Rs72, Target Rs83, Upside 14.6%

 

Commercial vehicle (CV) volumes jumped 33% in FY10. This momentum is bound to continue considering recent trends in industrial activity, rise in infrastructure focus and better finance availability. Amidst this scenario, we expect Ashok Leyland to gain market share. Operating margins will remain resilient over the medium term owing to strong pricing power, stability in commodity prices and higher production from Uttarakhand plant. With a PAT CAGR of 36% during FY10-12E, we believe the stock is trading attractive at a P/E of 12.2x FY12E EPS of Rs5.9. Reiterate BUY with a target price of Rs83.

 

http://content.indiainfoline.com/wc/research/researchreports/Ashok_Leyland_300810.pdf

**[investwise]** Thematic Funds aka Infra Funds, Fail To Deliver

 

Thematic funds, particularly infrastructure funds, may soon be losing their charm, say analysts monitoring the funds' performance in the last three years.


Infrastructure funds that were a big draw and showed outstanding gains between 2004 and 2008, are now disappointing investors. A thematic fund by definition invests predominantly in securities representing a particular investment strategy.


"The reason why infra funds did exceptionally well in the pre-crisis period was because they were bullish on realty. Most of the infra funds focussed heavily on the realty sector which saw a 100 per cent increase in a single year. They had invested in all the 'biggies'.


Therefore, when the sector experienced a fall, the funds also followed suit." says Mr Hiren Dhakan, Associate Fund Manager, Bonanza Portfolio Ltd. Over the last three years, these funds have given average annual returns of around 35-40 per cent; earlier their annualised average returns were about 67 per cent.


Little interest seen


As of May 2010, there were about 140 funds which invest in broadly 25 themes in India. Fifteen of them are infrastructure funds. "Infra funds are the only thematic funds which are of any meaningful scale. Other thematic funds such as Canara Robeco F.O.R.C.E Fund, DSP Blackrock Natural Resources and New Energy fund, Fortis Sustainable Development Fund do exist, but they are few and far in between and are not as big as the infra funds." said Mr Dhirendra Kumar, CEO, Value Research.


Even though the returns from infrastructure funds are higher than that from the other thematic funds, investors are fast losing confidence in them as the returns have been declining over the years.


"The infra space has, of late, seen very little interest. There have not been many applications for these funds. ICICI, Tata, Birla Sun Life are some of the fund houseswhose infra funds have shown relatively good performance; but most of the other infra funds have not done well." says Mr Dhakan.


While some fund managers consider pharma and banking funds as thematic funds, analysts prefer to categorise them as sectoral funds, and not thematic funds.


Post-March 2009, banking funds gave very high returns - annual average of 128 per cent, because of the "strong and supportive policies implemented by the Reserve Bank of India" according to a report on thematic funds by CRISIL. But the question whether these can be called thematic funds remains.


"Infrastructure is a loosely defined category. In the BSE Sensex, almost 70 per cent of the stocks would fall in the category of infrastructure companies if we exclude IT, pharma and FMCG. Thus, thematic funds are different from sectoral funds. Which is why one cannot compare infra funds with banking funds or pharma funds, which are largely sectoral funds." says Mr Dhirendra Kumar.


Volatility high


Thematic funds are known for their volatility as their investments are very narrow. Since the investment is focussed on only one sector, the risk is higher. In good times, it will translate into higher returns; but in bad times, it will lead to, possibly, even bigger losses.


Therefore, thematic funds structurally attract investors who are aggressive and are exposed to higher risk. "Thematic funds are very aggressive and based on very precise themes. So, investors must keep this in mind and realise the high-risk factor. And if there really is an appetite for risk, then why can't investors go for mid-cap and small-cap funds? There, the investors will get a wider choice and also there is higher stability in the returns of these funds." says Mr Dhakan


According to analysts, one of the drawbacks of infrastructure funds is that they are only focussed on the construction and realty sectors.


What they need to do is to diversify their portfolios into other infrastructure companies such as cement, utilities and energy."If you are looking at long-term systematic returns, then investors need to diversify. Cement stocks, in particular, have a much lower beta and, therefore should do well." concludes Mr Dhakan.



Safe Harbor Statement:

Some forward looking statements on projections, estimates, expectations & outlook are included to enable a better comprehension of the Company prospects. Actual results may, however, differ materially from those stated on account of factors such as changes in government regulations, tax regimes, economic developments within India and the countries within which the Company conducts its business, exchange rate and interest rate movements, impact of competing products and their pricing, product demand and supply constraints.
 
Nothing in this article is, or should be construed as, investment advice.
 
 
 

 
 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
*****************************************
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/investwise/

INVESTMENTS IN INDIA
We are low-risk, long-term investors. 

Stocks, mutual funds and the entire investment gamut.  Only financing/investment avenues in India will be discussed. 

For any assistance, questions or improvement ideas, contact investwise-owner@yahoogroups.co.in

****************************************************************

NEW! ==== Check our LINKS and FILES sections for a world of information. REGULARLY UPDATED.

NEW! ==== Check "Tracklist" in Links and Files sections for Investment Ideas.

****************************************************************
.

__,_._,___

**[investwise]** If FII money does not come in now & fast-the equities will slide rapidly

 

If you've been unsure about which way to turn, the latest events should have cleared up any lingering doubts.Until a short while ago, although most Americans sensed — intuitively or personally — that something was amiss, they couldn't be sure.


We had a semblance of recovery in the U.S. economy. The stock market was going up. And the Washington PR machine was working overtime to persuade us that "everything's OK."


So I can understand how this dichotomy — between what you feel and what they're saying — could have created some confusion. Now, however, that uncertainty is over, done, finished.


Heck, even during the recent "recovery" phase, we knew that the economy was running on just two cylinders: Government stimulus and some manufacturing. But now, those two are ALSO grinding to a halt:


First, consider manufacturing: The Philadelphia Fed's manufacturing index just plunged 7.7 percent! That's not just a slowdown in production growth. For the first time in more than a year, U.S. factory output is actually shrinking!


Second, government stimulus: Federal money is running out, and no more stimulus is forthcoming. Meanwhile, cities and states are swimming in so much red ink, many are shutting down schools, fire stations and entire police divisions.


The laid off workers are in shock. They thought their government jobs were secure. They never dreamed they'd find themselves on the unemployment lines.


Most economists are equally shocked. They had no clue that unemployment would surge at this stage in the "recovery."


Case in point: Last week, among the 42 economists surveyed by Bloomberg, not ONE predicted a large increase in new claims for jobless benefits. In fact, week after week, most of the "experts" have been putting out projections that the new claims were about to decline.


Instead, just the opposite has been happening! And last week, jobless claims surged again — this time to 500,000, the worst in nine months.


In other words, in addition to the millions of unemployed that have STILL not found jobs — even a year or more after the last big dip in the economy — a whole NEW crop of laid off workers are now flooding the government's unemployment offices.


Those same economists also said personal bankruptcies were going to go down. Wrong again! Bankruptcies are now surging by as much as 9 percent every three months. That's an annualized increase of 36 percent per year!


In fact, the last time we saw a plague of bankruptcies this big was in 2005 when hundreds of thousands hurriedly filed before the new, stricter bankruptcy laws went into effect.


What to Do Now


First, move most of your money to safe, short-term cash parking places. Yes, I know — the yields stink. But in a sinking economy, the return OF your money is far more important than the return ON your money.


Second, don't assume that every bank is safe or that the government can fully bail you out no matter how many banks may fail. Do business strictly with banks that have the resources to survive bad times even without government aid.

Safe Harbor Statement:

Some forward looking statements on projections, estimates, expectations & outlook are included to enable a better comprehension of the Company prospects. Actual results may, however, differ materially from those stated on account of factors such as changes in government regulations, tax regimes, economic developments within India and the countries within which the Company conducts its business, exchange rate and interest rate movements, impact of competing products and their pricing, product demand and supply constraints.
 
Nothing in this article is, or should be construed as, investment advice.
 
 
 

 
 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
*****************************************
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/investwise/

INVESTMENTS IN INDIA
We are low-risk, long-term investors. 

Stocks, mutual funds and the entire investment gamut.  Only financing/investment avenues in India will be discussed. 

For any assistance, questions or improvement ideas, contact investwise-owner@yahoogroups.co.in

****************************************************************

NEW! ==== Check our LINKS and FILES sections for a world of information. REGULARLY UPDATED.

NEW! ==== Check "Tracklist" in Links and Files sections for Investment Ideas.

****************************************************************
.

__,_._,___

**[investwise]** Martin Weiss: What If The Rally From March 2009 Was Just A Bubble?

 

If Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke honestly believes what he said at Jackson Hole on Friday — that he can save the economy by printing more money and buying more bonds — he's hallucinating.
 
Through the first quarter of this year, he printed $1.5 trillion of paper money and promptly bought $1.5 trillion in mortgage bonds, government agency bonds, and Treasury bonds.
But the entire effort was a dismal failure; the U.S. economy is still sinking and most large American banks are still weak.
 
The underlying reason: While the government has been borrowing massively, nearly everyone else has embarked on unprecedented debt LIQUIDATIONS.
 
In other words ...
While Washington is gorging itself on new debts, nearly every other sector is undergoing massive liposuctions.
How do we know? Because that's what the Federal Reserve itself is reporting — unambiguously and conclusively.
 
 
Based on the Fed's latest Flow of Funds report (Table F4, "Credit Market Borrowing"), governments are borrowing massively.
 
But the collapse in private sector credit is so dramatic that among ALL the major categories the Fed tracks, NOT ONE is expanding its debts. Rather, every single sector is in advanced stages of unprecedented and massive debt liquidations!
 
Specifically, as you can see in the chart above ...
  • Corporations are cutting back on their bonds at a record pace of $355 billion per year ...

  • Banks are cutting back on their lending at the yearly rate of $273 billion, and ...

  • Worst of all, mortgages are being liquidated at a record-smashing pace of $560 billion annually.
In addition, the Fed is reporting net cutbacks in consumer credit ($39 billion), open market paper ($154 billion), agency bonds ($16 billion), and other loans ($174 billion).
 
And remember: We're not just talking about a slowdown in the pace of new borrowing — the pattern we used to see in typical recessions of the past. No! These are actual net reductions in debts outstanding — the basic stuff that depressions are made of.
 
In sum, nearly all the money Bernanke has printed — plus all the money he has supposedly poured into the economy — is going nowhere, except perhaps down the drain. He's clearly running on a treadmill ... pushing on a string.
 
Whatever you do, do not underestimate the potential impact of this situation. It is ...
Huge! Including both the government and private sectors, the total new credit created in 2007 was $4.5 trillion. Now, it's running at an annual pace of about ZERO! That $4.5 trillion was LOT of money — and it's all money that's NOT pouring into the economy any more.
 
Unprecedented! This has never happened before in modern times — not even during the deepest recession of the postwar era. During the Great Depression? Yes. But in proportion to GDP, the debt buildup before the Depression — as well as the debt liquidations during the Depression — were not as large as they are now.
 
Getting worse! Despite everything Bernanke has done to try to stop it, the debt liquidations are accelerating — especially in the mortgage area. Consider these basic facts:
 
Back in 2005, lenders issued $1.4 trillion in new mortgages over and above those that were paid off or went bad — a fantastic amount of fresh new money pouring into the housing and construction markets.
 
But by 2008, they had cut back their new mortgage lending by a whopping 94 percent. The industry virtually died — an unmitigated disaster for the economy.
 
At that point, pundits assumed it was the end of the decline. On a net basis, the creation of mortgages in the U.S. was practically down to zero. "So how much further could it possibly fall?" they asked.
 
Meanwhile, Bernanke apparently assumed that, by buying crazy, unprecedented amounts of mortgage bonds, he could somehow stop the decline — or at least offset its impact. But the decline in the mortgage market didn't end there in 2008 ...

In 2009, it got worse — a lot worse! Not only was new mortgage money largely unavailable but OLD mortgage money was pulled out. Result: We saw net mortgage liquidations of $283 billion!
 
And for the first quarter of 2010, as I highlighted earlier, the Fed reports net liquidations running at an annual pace of $560 billion, the worst in history.
 
The Unavoidable Consequences
These forces are more enduring than any monetary policy, bigger than any government. They are unmistakable, unavoidable, and overwhelming.
 
Bernanke can try to make believe they don't exist. But you cannot afford to take that risk. You must recognize the truth and consequences that he's not talking about ...
 
Consequence #1. Bernanke's nearly powerless. No matter how many more bonds he buys, Bernanke cannot save the recovery. Sure, he could push 30-year fixed mortgage rates down some more. But even the lowest mortgage rates in recorded history haven't made a bit of difference. In fact, despite low rates, mortgages are being liquidated at an even FASTER clip. Home sales falling even MORE rapidly.
 
Consequence #2. Double dip. The double-dip recession we've been warning you about is now on its way. Meanwhile, administration economists still swear on a stack of Bibles that the double dip is not in the cards; and private economists think the probability of a double dip is only 20 to 30 percent. They must be getting their hallucinogens from the same source as Bernanke.
 
Consequence #3. More bank failures! As a whole, despite government bailouts and regulatory reform, the nation's banks and thrifts are no healthier today than they were before the onset of the debt crisis. The big difference: This time the government is unlikely to have nearly as much political or financial capital to bail them out.
 
 
Do not believe Bernanke! Given all the facts he has at his fingertips — the same ones I've just presented here this morning — I doubt he even believes himself.


 
Safe Harbor Statement:

Some forward looking statements on projections, estimates, expectations & outlook are included to enable a better comprehension of the Company prospects. Actual results may, however, differ materially from those stated on account of factors such as changes in government regulations, tax regimes, economic developments within India and the countries within which the Company conducts its business, exchange rate and interest rate movements, impact of competing products and their pricing, product demand and supply constraints.
 
Nothing in this article is, or should be construed as, investment advice.
 
 
 

 
 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
*****************************************
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/investwise/

INVESTMENTS IN INDIA
We are low-risk, long-term investors. 

Stocks, mutual funds and the entire investment gamut.  Only financing/investment avenues in India will be discussed. 

For any assistance, questions or improvement ideas, contact investwise-owner@yahoogroups.co.in

****************************************************************

NEW! ==== Check our LINKS and FILES sections for a world of information. REGULARLY UPDATED.

NEW! ==== Check "Tracklist" in Links and Files sections for Investment Ideas.

****************************************************************
.

__,_._,___